RIP JPG Magazine, 2005-2009
by Todd ~ January 2nd, 2009. Filed under: On the Web.
The economic downturn is starting to hit the small startups that have dotted the photographic landscape through the past few years. This morning I received an email announcing that JPG Magazine will be disbanding as of Monday, Jan 5th. It was also announced on the magazine’s blog, though the Web site still appears as if all is well. Still, come Monday, the site will disappear into the Ethernet.
In its original incarnation, the magazine was available for purchase on a print-on-demand format through Lulu.com. (Early issues are still available in this way.) After an all-too-familiar power struggle between two of the founders, the magazine attempted to access more mainstream distribution channels. I don’t know for sure, but this decision appears to have been fatal as its been unable to cover its costs with newsstand and subscription sales. For those inclined to schadenfreude, justly so.
I do find it astonishing that “a community of 200,000 photographers” couldn’t be organized to fund the magazine in some way. Even following the 80/20 rule of the publishing company’s name, they potentially had 40,000 paying customers. The staffing appears to be structured for a much larger subscriber base, but I’d guess there was something fundimentally wrong with how they went about running their operation. Or running on wishful thinking, like a lot of the economy in the past couple years.
January 2nd, 2009 at 3:36 pm
[...] RIP JPG Magazine, 2005-2009 [...]
January 3rd, 2009 at 10:46 am
given the quality of the photos is this really a surprise?
January 3rd, 2009 at 4:19 pm
Well, I wasn’t going to touch on that, but since you brought it up…
JPG started as a Flickr group, so the aesthetic has a lot in common with what you see as “Interesting” photos there. I think a lot of it has to do with the semi-competitive structure driving. The photos were chosen by the JPG community, so its a consensus-driven, middle of the road style. I’d guess a lot of the pictures were taken to impress the other members rather than having any sort of internal integrity. There’s a generic, stock photography sense in many of the pictures, even if most are technically quite competent. Not terribly different from your typical camera club, probably, save the scale.
January 5th, 2009 at 7:52 am
[...] surprised by the number of emails I’ve received and the number of blog posts I’ve seen (here, here, here, here, here and here) regarding the demise of JPG magazine. Taking something that [...]
January 6th, 2009 at 7:51 am
[...] blog-o-sphere is currently buzzing with the news that JPEG magazine is closing its doors. (here, here, here, here, here, here and [...]
February 15th, 2009 at 12:53 pm
I personally like the new simple sites that are starting to shoot up such as http://www.photoartmuseum.com. Its a great site for photographers to showcase their work and get paid for it.
-Will